martes, 28 de mayo de 2013

KAWESQAR PRESS REALEASE ON FISHERIES LAW





PRESS RELEASE ABOUT ACTIONS TAKEN BY
FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE COMMITTEE
AT THE CHILEAN SENATE ABOUT THE REAL NEED FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION THE
RIGHT OF CONSULTATION AND ACCESS TO
AQUATIC RESOURCES FOR THE KAWESQAR POPULATION  & AMENDMENTS ON LAW OF FISHERIES AND AQUICULTURE N°18.892


1. - The Kawesqar Community that resides in Puerto Eden are the last practitioners of their culture. They are 14 people who have fought for the preservation of their way of life, and are one of the surviving populations from an extensive process of Colonial-era ethnic cleansing in Patagonia.

2. - As a clear Minority Group of indigenous people, they hold secure a series of Human Rights as Chile has ratified ongoing International Treaties, giving the State an obligation to enforce and comply. We will describe several relevant standards that must be considered when modifying the law, under the risk of violating indigenous rights and compromising international law.

3. - The main rights of indigenous people -specifically Kawesqar- that are relevant in the Law's draft, is the Right to consultation and protection and access to natural resources that are considered their territory.

4. - This Right to Consultation is provided in Treaty N° 169, Article 6, which states: "In applying the provisions of this treaty, governments shall consult the peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, whenever consideration is given  to legislative or administrative measures which may affect them directly" This consultation should be made when handling Law N° 18992 as it directly regulates the exploitation of aquatic resources, to which Kawesqars have traditionally had access. Thus, it is needed to be evaluated because they hold the right to use those resources too for regular subsistence.

5. - It should be noted that the present instance, to which I was summoned, does not constitute consultation as provided for in the Convention 169 of the ILO and international practice on the matter, which is already international custom. All inquiries must comply with the following international standards: elladebe made in advance, is not limited to mere infofrmation, should be done in good faith in a process that builds trust between the parties, be appropriate and through indigenous representative institutions, be systematic and transparent, as well as having a wide scope to all decisions that may affect indigenous peoples. There is then a gap between a rationale for our position and effective consultation on legislative matters such complex scientific, technical and anthropological as to which refers the bill.

6. - Regarding the protection of natural resources, it should be noted that the that the Kawesqar Community resident to Puerto Eden, has as one main activity: the extraction of marine resources, and legislative action to regulate these resources must be previously consulted with and to the community because of how involved is their culture. Both current and historical antecedents ratify the above, Kawesqars have been characterized by its close relationship to the maritime territory for thousands of years, which currently still haves various manifestations, being one of the most important, their rights to fish.

7. - This ancestral right to access the resources of the sea, is referred to in Articles 13, 14 and 15 of Convention No. 169 concerning the protection and preservation of access to resources that are in our territories. In addition, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007 in Articles 26, 27 and 32, enshrines those rights. Furthermore, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1989, Article 27 enshrines the right of ethnic minorities to their own culture. In relation to this article, is transcendental to refer to the statement reiterated the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations, which has indicated that the cultural life of a people is expressed in the use of resources, and specifically mentioned including fishing and hunting, and the right to live in reserves protected by law.

8. - In addition to that the committee has recurrently known of similar cases to Kawesqars, and we must agree to state three basic issues regarding the rights of coastal people:

a) That Fishing is protected under Article 27 of the International Convenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

b) There are laws that can interfere with the exercise of rights under this article.

c) Only a well informed process of broad participation may authorize the affected communities establishing regulations on the rights emanating from the article, but without being a waiver of those rights.

9. - Administrative measures should be implemented to make sure that the Rights of the fishing village of Kawesqars are respected and that it is an ancestral and traditional premise for them to access their maritime territory, because of subsistence and traditional activities that they develop, and also to have access to marine resources to serve their community, as stated in Article 14 of the Convention 169 of UNILO.
 
10. - To conclude, it is important to emphasize that is expected that the Right of Consultation is respected and actually applied during the Amendment of this Law, thus complying with the mandates of the Treaty in force. Throughout this consult process the Rights of the Kawesqars as original people from this territories comply with the use of Natural Resources for all.

DRAFT ON CONSULTATIONS & PARTICIPATION RULES ON CONVENTION N° 169 PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CHILE







STATEMENT OF THE KAWESQAR COMMUNITY RESIDENT IN PUERTO EDEN

After analyzing the Draft Under Articles 6 and 7 of Convention 169 of the ILO, the Kawesqar Community Resident in Puerto Eden, linguistically and culturally recognized as Living Human Treasures, by UNESCO and the Government of Chile has no choice but to reject  this project for the following reasons:

1. The project is unconstitutional. It assumes powers to restrict central aspects of Convention No. 169, ignoring that it is protected by the provisions of Article 5 of the Chilean Constitution.

2. The project is illegal. To access Rights to consultation and participation, it establishes requirements not covered by Convention No. 169. In cases of investment projects, it gives the right to query to the regular system of common procedures on Environmental Impact Evaluation, which is in no way authorized by the agreement. It also has processes not covered by it, which undermines these rights and alters the traditional representation forms of our communities.

3. The project is inappropriate. It places the communities of the Magallanes Region and Chilean Antarctica at transnational aquaculture and tourism mercy of interests, by excluding the investment projects of the consultation process, subjecting  to consultation regime only the matters of Environmental Impact Evaluation. For our communities (strongly linked to the coast and its resources) this is a direct attack on their traditions, practices and rights.

4. The Government of Chile questions his own honor and its obligations with the international community. To impose this regulation on the territory of  Chile it will incur in international responsibility


PROJECT OVERIEW
REGULATION OF CONSULTATIONS
ILO CONVENTION N°169

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Convention N° 169 of the International Labour Organization (ILO) was ratified by Chile on September 15th, 2008, published on October 2nd, 2008 and the article was published in the Official Journal on October 14th, 2008.

This instrument  is an international treaty to be governed by own rules and particularly by the rules of Article 5, Art. 32 N° 15, and Art. 54 N° 1 of the Chilean Constitution.

Under Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969, and of which Chile is also a party, any treaty must be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in its context and taking into account the object and purpose. The same article provides that, in addition, this should be understood also in its preamble and annexes.

Indeed, the preamble of the N°169 Convention provides that it is agreed that in many parts of the world, indigenous people are unable to enjoy basic Human Rights as the rest of the population, as they live with their laws, values, customs and perspectives because the have not been eroded. The text of the Convention itself and its references to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and international instruments on the prevention of discrimination, make sure that this convention is considered within the catalog of international instruments of Human Rights protection.

Is in this way, that provisions of the final paragraph of the 5th Article of the Chilean Constitution can be used: it is Government's duty to respect and promote the fundamental Rights that emanate from the individuals, these are guaranteed by the Constitution and international treaties ratified by Chile that are in force. One of these agreements is precisely Convention N°169.

Therefore, the treaty haves a constitutional character and requires State agencies to address to their terms. Any action outside of what the same instrument authorizes implies an incurable case of nullity of public law. This is guaranteed by the 7th Article of the Constitution of the Republic of Chile, saying that no magistrate, no person or group of people can be attributed, even on the pretext of extraordinary circumstances, any authority or rights than those expressly conferred upon it by the Constitution or laws. It adds that any act in violation of any such provision is null and rise to the liabilities and penalties established by law.

Neither the text of Convention No. 169 nor its promulgation appears authorization act for the Government of Chile appropriate to repeal, modify or suspend its provisions. Therefore, any change is void and of no value, since the provisions of the fifth paragraph of paragraph 1 of Article 54 of the Constitution of the Republic of Chile. And you need to understand that a restriction on the scope of the rules of the Convention, in particular the right of consultation, is an improper modification of that international instrument.

Moreover, under Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty. The preeminence of international law over domestic law has also been declared in several judgments and advisory opinions of international jurisdiction: like in Alabama, 1872; Case of the Greco-Bulgarian Communities, 1930; PCIJ, Series B, No. 17, page 32.; Case of Polish Nationals in Danzig,1931; CPJU Series A / B, No. 44, p. 24; Case of the Free Zones, 1932;  PCIJ Series A / B, No. 46, p. 167 and Applicability of the Obligation to Arbitrate under the Headquarters Agreement of the United Nations, Case of the PLO Mission, 1988; ICJ Reports 1988, p. 12. Indeed, in the case of the Greco-Bulgarian Communities (1930), the Permanent Court of International Justice stated that "it is a generally accepted principle of international law in relations between Powers who are parties to a treaty, the provisions of law internal cannot trump those of the treaty. "Finally, Convention No. 169 does not require any rule of law to make it applicable. The instrument is self-executing, as we have stated the Superior Courts of Justice. It would be absurd to refer the legal scope of rights under the Convention to the regulatory power of the state itself in respect of which it intended to assert those rights. Neither the text nor the straight logic suggest that there should proceed to issue a regulation to implement the rights contained in this instrument.

From all the foregoing:

i) Convention No. 169 is within the international catalog of instruments to protect human rights;

ii) that according to the constitutional rules of Chilean law, he cannot be modified by acts of law;

iii) that any restrictive amendment thereof would result in a case of nullity of public law, which could be claimed on a national and international level.

  
SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE TEXT
OF THE REGULATION UNDER CONSIDERATION

These considerations should be taken into account when considering the draft regulation on consultations Convention N° 169, proposed by the Government of Chile.

First, IT is legally unnecessary and undesirable. Unnecessary, because it is self-executing an international instrument, which are not covered in any of its policies called the law of each state to make it applicable. It is a Drawback, because it will lead to a contentious Government on its scope in specific cases where it is intended to be applicable.

The project goes through concepts that turn to illegible as they are not covered by the Convention.

In its 2nd Article: The draft manages a Query concept that is not contained in Convention N° 169, here, the formula "mutual benefit" is wrongly introduced because between the Chilean Gov and native people exists an equal relationship. This undermines the very human rights system. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has stated about this that:

"... Modern Human Rights treaties in general, and particularily, the American Convention, are not multilateral treaties of the traditional cut that are constructed to accomplish the reciprocal exchange of Rights for mutual benefit of the contracting States . Their object and purpose is the protection of the fundamental rights of human beings, regardless of nationality, both against their own state as compared to the other Contracting States. "(Inter-American Court of Human Rights, The Effect of Reservations on the Entry into Force of the American Convention on Human Rights (Articles 74 and 75), Advisory Opinion OC-2/82 of September 24, 1982)

The context and scope of Convention N° 169 is indicated in the text itself, it is intended to protect the rights of indigenous peoples and to guarantee respect for their integrity on the part of governments. It is therefore an obligation of the latter, governments, the provide for such purposes, which cannot be confused with compensation or mutual benefit formulas, which could make the worst practices incur compensatory damages to the identity and rights of our peoples.

Insistence on assimilations approach of native ethnic groups

Moreover, the assimilations approach of the draft regulations is evident in another set of proposed provisions in it. It is striking that he calls "investment projects" under the System of Environmental Impact Assessment, would be regulated by the consultation procedure of Law N° 19,300. Again here, the project incurred in illegality, the project goes beyond what the law authorizes, in this case  Convention N° 169. Chile's government is not allowed to play in this case, by analogy, the scope of the consultation process and equate them with procedures provided for environmental conservation purposes. None of the provisions of Convention N° 169 refers to a school of this type, and Convention N° 169 is the law of the Republic of Chile and is current public law.

Moreover, when Article 6 of Convention N° 169 concerning procedures "appropriate", this word should be given its natural and obvious sense, that is: "applied to everything what is proper and more convenient." (Dictionary of the Spanish Royal Academy of Language 22th edition (2001))

And appropriateness should apply to the object of protection under the Convention this is to protect the rights of indigenous peoples and to guarantee respect for their integrity. This object escapes process under the System of Environmental Impact Assessment, of Law N° 19300.

The ILO Manual on Convention N° 169,  states that for an "appropriate" query requirements must meet the needs of each specific situation, and must be meaningful, sincere and transparent. The assimilation procedure of Law N° 19.300 would be far from complying with the requirement to be appropriate to the specific situation of the respective indigenous communities.

Unduly excludes investment projects of query from Convention N° 169.

It is also clear that what we are looking a draft regulation that is left out of the assessment made by the communities of people with investment projects, as these are decisions with certain specifications. In fact, the aforementioned draft proposes regulation states that it applies only to legislative measures and general administrative orders. This distinction between measures of general administrative and legislative matters is of obvious contrast, including administrative measures, this is not mentioned anywhere in any of the  provisions of  Convention N°169.

Again this is a illegality option of the proposed project. It happens, however, that the special administrative measures are the most harmful effects and Kawesqar ethnicity is more that ever involved, for this is the relationship with the coastal and marine environment which is elementary for our people. It is in this environment where the Government provides extensive maritime and aquaculture concessions, often to particular corporations or industrial companies that perform intensive farming in our territories, and these are cases of special administrative measures, or fall outside the consultation process, or at best times it would be subject to the assimilatory scheme of Law N° 19.300.



Induces wasteful procedural traps.

Through it seeks to impose a definition of the terms "direct concern" caused by the measures likely to visit. In Article 6 of Convention N°169 provides consultation with the people concerned and this shall be "each time given to legislative or administrative measures which may affect them directly." However, illegally and arbitrarily, the Government introduced a rating to this formula, by requiring that "involvement" is "significant." Then listed cases in which it is understood that there will be such "significant damage." It is understood, however, whether these are cases in which the law presumes that such an effect exists, or if it is just a legal presumption in which may argue against such a presumption. Because, under a legal technique unfortunate, in each case again uses the word "significant" implying that even in them, a third party may invoke - now inside the case - that the species question would not be met, hypothetically, the status of "significance." With this, the position of indigenous peoples affected by a measure, to see, first restricted, then threatened by the definition tautological, & circular, this formula: direct involvement / significant involvement: a third party involved may bring the matter to a court of the State of Chile, arguing that the measure has no significant effects, and end by subtracting the decision on the scope of a measure of the consultation process itself should been made to the community directly affected. The consultation process may thus be a futile exercise, which will respond to the Government of Chile, also forcing communities to test the significance of the planned intervention in wasteful legal proceedings, which were not even remotely under the Convention. This opens the door wide to the national picaresque in its various forms.

Needless to say that such a reference to the "significance" of involvement appears not mentioned in any provision of the Convention N° 169. Therefore, the draft rules again incurs in illegality.

It is also clear that such significant involvement will be decided by the political authority of the Government of Chile. It will, then, abstract again the consultation process, which is precisely what seeks to define whether a particular measure has effects that are prized for their communities. Therefore, the project is entered in a field that is not its own, is therefore doubly illegal and arbitrary.

The forms for participating in the project alter traditional forms of representation.
Finally, the proposed regulation is also in charge of participation procedures. This introduces the concept of commissions, one national and other regional. This practice violates community representation on their own realities; going at this point precisely against the explicit provisions of Convention No. 169. Thereby disrupts the sense of participation, to the extent that she is willing to ensure equitable access to elective institutions and other representative and responsible for policies and programs that concern them. Convention does not address in any way the creation of intermediary bodies of participation, such as the draft regulations. The risk of politicization of this representation and the intrusion of corporate interests in indigenous policy is open and the project of the Government of Chile.


CONCLUSION

Examination of the core provisions of the draft regulations for consultation and participation of Convention No. 169 shows that it unduly restricts the scope and meaning of the right to consultation and disrupts the pattern of community representation. It is therefore a project queanuncia vices unconstitutionality and illegality.
The project, attempting to regulate those rights risks in trying to define to end restricting them, which is not competent to the regulatory powers of the Government of Chile. The substance of these rights in the Convention itself, as well as treaties, conventions and covenants on human rights declares that it is founded.
Therefore, the draft regulation is unconstitutional, illegal, inappropriate and is likely to be faced in the administrative and judicial branches, as well as nationally and internationally. So this indigenous community does not endorse or delegated representative to any person and any agreement taken under our name, will be completely unknown.


KAWESQAR COMMUNITY RESIDENT IN PUERTO EDEN

PUERTO EDEN KAWESQAR COMUNITY PRESENTATION AT THE LATINO PARLIAMENT



PUERTO EDEN KAWESQAR COMUNITY
PRESENTATION AT THE LATINO PARLIAMENT

Punta Arenas, Chile, April 26th, 2012

"CHILE´S HISTORICAL DEBT WITH SOUTHERN CANOEISTS
COMUNTIES: CURRENT CONDITIONS "

We truly Thank PARLATINO for the opportunity to present the features and conditions of our race, one of the most endangered Species and one of the least known of these latitudes.

We reside in Puerto Eden, a small coastal village that is located at coordinates 49 ° 08 'S and 74 ° 25', on the Southern entrance to Messier Channel and immediately East of Wellington Island. Puerto Eden is the only population of Bernardo O'Higgins National Park, the largest protected wilderness area in the country and one of the largest on the planet, a biological reservoir of water resources are in this territories and still unexplored. East of Puerto Eden, the Southern Ice Field is located, yet unbounded place which constitutes an important global reserve of fresh water, not counting its strategic importance for the whole region.

Our Community in Puerto Eden is the latest sociological community of this ethnic group. The fourteen people who have fought for the preservation of our culture live here. We are one of the surviving populations of an extensive process of extermination of the five ethnic groups originate to Patagonia.

We live in a landscape. But living conditions are extremely difficult. Town communications are seriously flawed. Just a ferry serves the community, service which is interrupted many times by different maters. When this happens, our isolation lasts up to several weeks. We lack adequate basic services. Electric power is supplied by a turbine, which at greatest demand does not keep up with the needs of the locals. Drinking water, despite the high natural availability of it, is a service that also presents failures. There is no sanitation services nor wastewater treatment, which has led the Bay of Puerto Eden to have trouble with its pollution conditions.

Moreover, the precarious housing for the resident Kawesqar families were donated by a Belgian foundation at the early 1990s. Up today houses are  badly damaged. We have not been able to get a financial initiative to recover these houses - which is a culturally relevant issue - even though the Community has developed a massive amount of projects for this purpose.

"Professor Miguel Contreras Montesinos School " provides Primary Schooling Education, making big efforts on this due to local conditions and recognition of their students as descendants of original people. However, Secondary and Higher Education haves to be taken on the Continent and even beyond the regional limits. We recently signed a cooperation agreement with the Magallanes University, which we hope to implement effectively soon, to provide granting of scholarships for the Community as well as the development of scientific research activities in full compliance with the rights of the community over their environment and their culture.

We are, however, a living community. We develop hard-cultural initiatives and rescue our traditions, despite the threats from the environment and others who affect our language, traditions and territory.

I would like to refer to the Kawesqar Territory as a huge challenge to preservation and protection.

It is important to note to the audience that Kawesqar people territoriality needs to be understood from their culture. As a counterpart to the extermination of nomad hunters, which were brought to its total extinction towards the 1940s, there are still two sociological canoeists nomadic communities of indigenous people on the Channels and Magallanes fjords: Puerto Williams Yagan Community  and us, Puerto Eden Kawésqar Community.

The geographical dispersion, mobility and territorial geography used by our ethnic comunitiy, helped us to survive extermination of native Patagonian populations. However, missionary activity and sedentary practice to which we are subjected, meant that we were forced to abandon gradually our nomadism, being replaced on missions run by churches or religious cults of European origin. By the year 1920, the Missionary activity concluded, our population had dwindled to permanent or semi-permanent settlements, such as Jetarkte, on Wellington Island and Rinconada Bulnes, in the Brunswick Peninsula.

Sedentarization policies were intensified in the last fifty years, induced precisely by the creation of our town of Puerto Eden, between 1949 and 1969.

As you can easily understand, sedentarism and such a remote & poor village has been a progressive weakening for Kawesqar population. One of the consequences we noted is Kawesqar Diaspora, with an obvious Generational & Cultural Gap. In fact, this has as results, that the number of recognized and accepted members of the Kawesqar Community does not exceed 120 people and, in a high percentage, of a second or third generation.

We are clustered in urbanization centers, breaking ties with all our nomadic traditions. We also face huge impoverishment and difficulties to access to various social and health services.


INTRODUCTION TO KAWESQAR CULTURE:

I want to introduce you to some of the ideas on Kawesqar conception of territory as a Dual Entity dominated by the Marine Environment.

Kawesqar Culture is based on its relationship with the Marine environment and the coastal area. The sea is for our people a communication media and source of livelihood. It is also a scenario to our worldview. Therefore, the area included in the channels and Magallanes fjords (jáutok), as well as open to the Pacific coast (málte) are defined and conceptualized in our culture. In those places manifestations of our culture stand, in the form of opportunities for fishing and hunting, harvesting, lambing, temporary camping, cemeteries and Taboo places. The coastal area and the sea, its waters and resources, are constitutive of our territory.

This shows an important condition of our culture: our nomadism. Despite the establishment of our community in Puerto Eden, cultural references are kept alive and demand respect.

Thus, the Kawesqar territory, is a likely turnover of other ancient cultures, is dominated by the marine and coastal environment. The sea dominates the land. It is he who allows us to get there and have temporary or permanent settlements.

This is why the Kawesqar territory is vast at sea. Therefore covers, access to terrestrial territory associated with it. This territory goes from the Golfo de Penas to the Estrecho de Magallanes. Distinction must be made between Málte and Jáutok, each with a specific contribution to the Kawesqar cosmogony. In addition, the territorry's toponymie also is known by Kawesqar language names, often known in parallel to the official name.

The Kawesqar population recognizes four zones for settlements. In latitudinal terms, going from north (aqáte) to south (sete) you will meet the Sǽlam or inhabitants of the north, which corresponds to the people living from the Golfo de Penas to the Canal Adalberto. Then, Kčewíte, residents in the area of southern Sǽlam, and settling from the Canal Adalberto to the Jorge Mont Island and Strait Nelson, the Kelǽlkčes, in the zone of Cabo de Ultima Esperanza and Tawókser, located in the Seno de Skyring, Seno Otway and on both sides of the Estrecho de Magallanes.

Travel narratives that have been documented from oral, show that the territory has been covered since time immemorial for purposes of subsistence by our population, then barter hunting products with fur traders and also using the marine environment for shellfish harvesting and small scale fishing and trading at the consumption areas.

In these stories, departure points are very important and denoted as referrals, also as intermediate and target points, before returns, are defined  and that builds on the Kawesqar social construction. This circumstance generates  a nomadic consciousness that anchors in the community and links navigation with points where sea and land offers best conditions for hunting, gathering and fishing.

This is especially important, because it implies a conception of the area that records their ancestral uses and incorporates modern activities, to the extent that these do not imply a transgression of the first. The sea and terrestrial environment should provide a living, and is the environment in which the community is sustainable, since it is aimed at development.

We need to expose how we got to this endangered condition as victims of a profound process of genocide / ethnocide.

The Kawesqar conception of territory, both: land and sea, is binary, it was not deserted at the time of Western colonization. It was, moreover, as shown by archaeological research, a fully controlled territory used by our people. The extent of this territory was always associated with the practice of hunting, fishing and gathering, which required large tracts of nomadism that would sustain the population.



It is on that population over which an exerted and extensive physical and symbolic violence was executed. The Kawesqar extermination process and land occupation by European colonization and Chileans were accompanied by physical extermination of the indigenous population, under the assumption that we did not meet the standards allowed to be subjects of law in the same condition of the people who invaded our territory. This practice not only goes back to the Chilean independence, but it especially and virulently starts from the first decades of the Republican era. The scope of the genocide of our people is a dark chapter of the history of the Chilean state. It is not easy to take care of such practices as one of the grounds on which formed the legal authority of the Republic of Chile in the southern end of the continent, demolishing the rights of an ethnia that was settled for thousands of years in these latitudes.

The practice of kidnapping with dead results were even admitted legally covered by the new Republic, for the exhibition of our ancestors in Cultured Human Zoos in Europe. This is an issue that we have been recently recognized in its full scope.

Genocide joined a number of practices to impose the alien culture on our people. Chasing assurance of the land allocated to settlers by the State of Chile, led migration, and reduced our people in religious missions, which began the process of destroying our culture, our traditions and our references, along bringing sicknesses and death of those who were brought to these camps and foreshadowed the worst practices that would develop Western cultures, a process that was later reinforced by the imposition of conscription, or mandatory engagement of our ancestors as precarious labor in agricultural or mining of central and northern Mexico. Orphaned children were, moreover, removed from their communities, under a condition attributed orphans to be adopted by families outside our village, having been lost track of their final destination.

So we know about genocide and how it was protected by the Republic of Chile, known through the stories of our elders and the chronicles of historians and researchers. But it recognized the full extent of the consequences he has caused to the survival of our ethnicity. Today we are held hostage in Puerto Eden, which we consider the principal center of our territory. There we preserved our culture and with a huge effort the material basis of it.

The Laws of Nations protects our Rights and I would like to refer about that right now:

It is clear nowadays that International Laws recognize our Rights as Indigenous People and as a minority in the Chilean State. This recognition has a Constitutional Status, therefore, it cannot be ignored, either by law or by the regulatory activities of the Authorities, in any form. No one can attribute themselves greater rights than the granted by the Chilean constitution, or may ignore or repeal Rules that have the Status of Basic Human Rights.

International Rights protects the material and immaterial base of the Kawesqar culture. This implies that: if Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on which C  Chile takes part in since 1989, recognizes minorities the right to exercise their culture, as recognized on numerous occasions by the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations. For the Committee, this protection of the identity of a native population means, the deployment of positive activities to protect it, removing obstacles for its exercise, so its not only language or religion, but in the use of resources, and specifically mentioned including fishing and hunting, and the right to live in reserves protected by law.

This implies that, for the Kawesqars, the right of access to marine resources and land is legally protected, and corresponds to the Chilean State and its authorities to respect it and promote it effectively.

And at this stage, I would like to remind you that when the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations made a public call to know of other cases like the Kawesqar, about this, they made three clear &basic statements on Rights of coastal people:
a) That sea ​​fishing is protected under Article 27 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;
b) That there are laws that can interfere with the exercise of rights under this article;
c) That with a broad participation and informed process by the affected communities may authorize the establishment of regulations to rights under the same article, but without being able to get a waiver of those rights.

Moreover, the Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization reaffirms our rights as coastal village. Of particular importance is the concept of territory contained in Article 13. It combines three elements. First, it points out a mandate for governments, in the sense that they, in implementing the Convention, must respect the special importance that the lands and territories have for the cultures and spiritual values ​​of the peoples concerned. That is, it is a term that encompasses all the actions of those governments, in its various manifestations. Second, it highlights the difference and, at the same time complementing the dimensions of land and territory. Under the Convention, the territory covers the total environment of the areas which the peoples concerned occupy or otherwise. Thus, the protection afforded by this provision exceed the pure land and framework should be extended to all the media that is used by these people. This would include, among other considerations: territory, waters, oceans and their resources.

We understand also that the coastal towns have a special right of consultation envisaged in the existing International Law.

We have a special right of consultation in addition to the general right of consultation of Article 6 of the Convention. Thus, a double right belonging to the Kawesqar Community resident in Puerto Eden, developing their livelihoods in that blending of sea and land, and ancestral practices developed using the resources of one dimension of our territory .

A double right query that must meet the same minimum standards that the Committee of Experts of the ILO has established for the implementation of Article 6 of the Convention. That is, there must be prior consultation, informed and directed in good faith to obtain consent. It is not, therefore, a mere right of ratification, since the query should be allowed to influence the implementation of the measure and properly evaluate their social, spiritual and cultural, as well as on the environment and its protection . The Chilean Supreme Court has been ordered around the same assumptions. Particular cases of great concern are stage mentioned.

That is why we are concerned about the latest actions of the Chilean Government and directly affecting the rights of the Kawesqar Community resident in Puerto Eden.

On this issue, we can mention, the Coastal Zoning of the Magallanes Region and Chilean Antarctica, which was made without any consultation, no one was informed, and specifically no one directed  conversations in good faith to reach agreement with the community. That has meant that today part of the Kawesqar Territory have been declared as an area suitable for aquaculture, with the subconsecuent invasion of our cultural, tangible and intangible property and culture.

It is reported by the political authority of Chile, that there should be a General Consultation on the  different Communities of the Indigenous people. Yet this same attention says:
a) That they recognize that there has been no prior consultation
b) intends to conduct further consultation, which violates International Covenant rules Civil and Political Rights and the Convention 169, leading to zoning rules and declarations of suitability of aquaculture areas are in a condition that we will seek to enforce invalid.

We have argued about the true fallacies of justifying the lack of prior consultation of the participation in the management of coastal and marine resources. Forget, in fact, the Government of Chile cannot argue because as per law, it violates International Commitments.

The members of the Kawesqar Community of Puerto Eden are seriously concerned about ads in a massive facility centers for intensive aquaculture salmon farming in our territory. We already know the disastrous results in the region of Los Lagos, and the pernicious effects on the Huilliche communities of that region. An activity that exploits the environment to the full, ad nauseum soiled, degrades the social and cultural environment as environmental or health crises facing ends up turning the state itself to save them from bankruptcy. We do not want that for our territory.

We are also concerned to recover our rights and coastal fisheries. A reverse Diaspora of hope and populate that space is our territory. But sustainably. No rush for alienated industrialization.

Today we are willing to fight in all forums, national and international for our culture which is part of our world view, our culture and heritage. Both of enormous wealth, despite the appearance of sobriety they have. We want, as we have said elsewhere, to make visible that under the simple is often the greatest wealth, and on the edge of this country and planet our people survive a claiming for dignity and recognition.